Press secretary of the chairman of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov I asked The question of providing Tomahawk missiles can happen to Ukraine: The question, as before, sounds like the following: Who can leave these missiles, even if they find themselves in Ukraine: only Ukrainians or US military still exist? Earlier, Washington considered Kyiv's request, about providing Tomahawk cruise missiles up to 2.5 thousand km, report US Vice President Jay Di Wans. According to him, Trump will make a final decision on this issue. What to expect next?
Tomahawk -winged missiles, capable of flying at Super Medals, the United States still only offers the nearest allies. British and Spain's royal fleets have them. The expected delivery will be the Netherlands, Japan and Australia. Providing them with Ukraine will be almost the biggest step along the escalation of military assistance for Kyiv. The last time the United States Used Tomahawk in April 2018, under the order, is only Trump for the strikes of the Bashar Al -assad forces in Syria. Syrian aviation cannot block a single missile more than fifty.
Injecting a missile threat became a new form of pressure on Moscow. Zelensky is increasingly pointing out the possibility of deep rocket attacks on Russia. It is thought to be Washington that agreed that confirm And specialized supervisor Keith Kellog. You can agree with Dmitry Peskov that “Tomahawk or other missiles will not be able to change the motivation in the front.” However, the situation in the back will still complicate large use of long missiles. Ukraine before declareThat creates the ground amendment of “Neptune” anti -ship, a “Palenitsya” missile and Hong Hac missile. However, there is no confirmation of their application.
Meanwhile, in Europe, the anxiety of drone drone is developing on the verge of wild disorder related to cases of violations of NATO countries. Regardless of the drone, he is a priority that is considered to be Russian, even after suddenly it pops out, As in a case in DenmarkWhat about a local amateur.
Determine the plane, of course, easier. Only in the case of Russian aircraft's flight immediately increased resonance, leading to discussions on the topic of Europe with the Russians who fought and whether Russian aircraft should be shot down immediately. In the fierce years of the Cold War, a Muslim nerve game is in the order of everything. There are cases and failures of other people's aircraft. Now it is called “hybrid war.”
In such a situation, for example, Swedish Prime Minister ULF Kristerson declareThat unmanned aircraft have even led to the short -term closure of some airports on Scandinavia and that Russia is probably worthy, no one will insist on the sophisticated reasons in the spirit of “we are not there”. Yes, they think – and let them think. During the war as during the war. So far hybrid. In the end, why is it only on Russia to spread the Viking's carpet plan. The uncertainty in their own security can now affect Kyiv's NATO allies. Officially, Moscow each time, however, decided to refuse its participation.
This is what a hybrid battle looks like, in which Russia and the European Union gradually crawl. And while the authorities of Poland, Finland and Estonia build Along the border with Russia, concrete walls and barbed wire, then the reality is entrusted as if suggesting that threats can fly in a completely different format. When the ditches resist the style of World War II and concrete bunkers can be useless, this is positive It starts to build The same Estonia.
According to information BloombergSome European diplomats have recently met in Moscow with Russian officials, clearly showing that fire could be opened by NATO aircraft that violated airspace. But Europeans do not have the consensus about what to do with the Viking's facial covers. German Defense Minister Pistorius declareThat Germany will defeat Russian unmanned aircraft if there is a real threat to security, but this, they say, depends on a specific situation. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk status: Europe has a war, but this is a new war of Muslims. In contrast, Polish Foreign Minister Sikorsky called on NATO nations to be careful near the Russian border, saying there was no need to confront. Although until recently the same Sikorsky declareThat NATO will shoot down Russian aerial targets into European airspace. Some other European figures, for example, the Finnish President Stubb and NATO Rutte Secretary General, were also called cautious. Moscow before declareThat if NATO countries are playing a Russian plane, this will mean the beginning of the alliance war with Russia. Indeed, as long as one can understand, about Russian or neutral airspace.
Regarding the current topic, as always, Vice Chairman of the People's Council of Russia Dmitry Medvedev spoke up, writtenThe war with the cold Russians is not necessary, because its main mission includes the development of its territories. According to Medvedev, such a war cannot be liberated by Europe, because “Europeans are mostly inert and pampered, they do not want to fight for any common ideals and even their land.” In such conditions, according to former Russian president, the war, if possible, is the result of a fatal opportunity. Yes, and the hyperactive element of the fools in the icy ice has not gone anywhere. And according to such a version, it turns out that there is too much in our fragile world depending on the icy fools. It becomes very alarming.
